Polygamy next?

Polygamy next?.

Posted in Legal issues | Leave a comment

Gay Marriage has Muslims eyeing Polygamy

The article with the above title can be found here, at the Middle East Forum. Its original title when published in a shorter form in the National Review was “Polygamy, Too: Muslims have started seeking their own redefinition of marriage”.

The article gives a good introductory overview of the link between the two issues, although its characterisation of polygamy as inevitably sexist and oppressive of women is not balanced by recent academic research in American Mormon communities, such as Janet Bennion’s “Women of Principle” and “Polygamous Families in Contemporary Society” by Altman and Ginat.

Posted in Blame Canada!, Brown Family v Utah, Legal issues | Tagged | Leave a comment

B.C. polygamy ban won't face any further appeals, province says

Reblogged from National Post | News:

By Jeff Lee

VANCOUVER — The B.C. provincial government has decided not to take the issue of polygamy to the Supreme Court of Canada, arguing that a recent ruling from the B.C. Supreme Court is sanction enough to begin prosecuting B.C. polygamists.

“While the opinion of a higher court may be more persuasive in case law, the government does not believe a referral decision is necessary.

Read more… 450 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Sister Wives

Reblogged from Mommy, Are You Our Servant?:

Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post
  • Click to visit the original post

Here come the brides!

I never understood polygamy.  What, exactly, is the appeal? Why would a man want to have to answer to so many women, when in most marriages, he can’t even listen to one? Maybe for the hanky-panky but really, that is a pretty high premium to pay for a few extra rolls in the hay.  And, why on God’s green earth would any woman want to share a husband with other women? 

Read more… 608 more words

Servant Mommy re-evaluates polygamy in the light of Sister Wives.
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Judge rules Sister Wives case can go ahead

Kody & Co will be celebrating, as Judge Waddoups has handed down his ruling that the Sister Wives family do have sufficient standing for their case against the Utah County Attorney to go ahead. While the other parties, including the Attorney General, have now been dismissed from the case, there can now be a trial to establish whether the Utah County Attorney’s continuing threat to prosecute the Brown’s simply for living polygamously amounts to a violation of their constitutional rights.

Read more from the Brown’s attorney Jonathan Turley here.

See the court’s ruling here.

Posted in Brown Family v Utah, Legal issues, Sister Wives | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Polygamy and the Presidency – Rick Santorum

OK, so maybe Mitt Romney is the more obvious subject for an article on polygamy and the US presidency, with his polygamous ancestry, espousal of a once-polygamous religion, and neat line in jokes that avoid these facts (“marriage should be between a man and a woman… and a woman and a woman…” – but Rick Santorum is the guy who keeps bringing it up, no doubt as a reminder of Romney’s inconvenient religious preference. However, Santorum does this invariably to compare polygamy with gay marriage, to say that the first is the inevitable consequence of the second.
Go here to see some analysis of this, or rather a suggestion that maybe audiences shouldn’t just recoil in horror at the suggestion.

You could also go to the judgement in the Constitutional Reference Case to find an argument that seeks to establish that gay marriage is OK, and that polygamy is reprehensible, although it might be difficult to differentiate between this and the Humpty Dumpty logic that Santorum is trying to unpick in his audiences.

Meanwhile, I close by drawing notice to the point that, just because polygamy is justified on all the arguments for gay marriage that Santorum exposes, doesn’t mean that it will get the same treatment. If anything, the Canadian polygamy judgement is evidence for saying that legal systems implementing human rights laws do not deliver human rights, but instead they deliver whatever the judge wants, backed by whatever rationalisation he finds convenient at the moment. Otherwise, why did just about every lawyer in Canada, including a series of special prosecutors, take the view for decades that polygamy would be protected, before the Chief Justice of BC came up with the idea that it was a bad thing, except for kids?

Posted in Blame Canada!, Media coverage of polygamy | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Not-so-private Idaho

Updated 15 January 2012
The School Board at Horseshoe Bend, Idaho, has placed School Superintendent John Cook on administrative leave for “personal reasons”. What those reasons are may be something to do with Boise resident Don Reiman’s decision to go public with a letter stating his 30-year old daughter Jana is in a polygamous relationship with Cook, though no marriage licence has been sought. Find the rest of the story here, along with video at KTVB.

“This is not easy to step up and essentially be exposing my daughter as a polygamist but sometimes it’s hard to do the right thing,” said Reiman.

The ‘right thing’ in this case includes exposing the detail of a private letter from his daughter detailing the relationship and the developing attitude of Cook’s first wife to what the Bible had to say about polygamy.

Continue reading

Posted in Media coverage of polygamy | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment